Instagram doesn't have any profits. It doesn't have any revenues. It doesn't have a marketing strategy to generate any money within the near future, either, so there is no point discussing if it's "worth" US$1 billion. It can't possibly be, whilst it almost definitely is.
Zuckerberg decided it was worth paying Instagram's founders US$1 billion in Facebook stock and cash, in case he was gazing the article that might relegate his career to a web-based historical curiosity.
Facebook doesn't must make a US$1 billion-plus return on Instagram. It's enough that Instagram can't now go directly to build a rival social network around smartphones where Facebook is weak.
Only YouTube rivals Instagram for the velocity at which it grew and the attention-dropping, jaw-popping price ticket at which it sold. Google knew its Google Video project was failing; it was as terrified as Zuckerberg that a rival was sprouting that will soon wreck its dominance of web advertising.
These hyper-defensive acquisitions are rare, particularly by companies still of their growth phase, like Facebook. But there are scores of small deals each month, where talent-hungry giants like Google buy a developer's not-that-hot start-up as portion of the method of hiring him.
- INDEPENDENT
By Stephen Foley
Nessun commento:
Posta un commento
Comments links could be nofollow free