Bidvert-advert

Stay Update - ICT Security

Enter your email address:

We hate spam as much as you do and we will never sell, barter, or rent your email address to any unauthorized third party.

Most Frequently Used Software


CURL / XPertMailer / AutoBlogger / (Parser - PHP Simple HTML DOM)



domenica 15 aprile 2012

Killing threat is priceless

Instagram doesn't have any profits. It doesn't have any revenues. It doesn't have a marketing strategy to generate any money inside the near future, either, so there is no point discussing if it's "worth" US$1 billion. It can't possibly be, whilst it most certainly is.

Zuckerberg decided it was worth paying Instagram's founders US$1 billion in Facebook stock and cash, in case he was looking at the article that may relegate his career to a web historical curiosity.

Facebook doesn't make a US$1 billion-plus return on Instagram. It's enough that Instagram can't now go directly to build a rival social network around smartphones where Facebook is weak.

Only YouTube rivals Instagram for the rate at which it grew and the attention-dropping, jaw-popping price ticket at which it sold. Google knew its Google Video project was failing; it was as terrified as Zuckerberg that a rival was sprouting that will soon wreck its dominance of online advertising.

These hyper-defensive acquisitions are rare, particularly by companies still of their growth phase, like Facebook. But there are scores of small deals each month, where talent-hungry giants like Google buy a developer's not-that-hot start-up as portion of the method of hiring him.

- INDEPENDENT

By Stephen Foley

Nessun commento:

Posta un commento

Comments links could be nofollow free