NHS believe in fined for sending forty five faxes to the incorrect person

@@@@@ Mayfair Community Health care NHS Trust continues to be fined £ ninety, 000 through the Information Commissioner's Workplace (ICO) after patient listings were faxed towards the wrong receiver.

@@@@@ The actual incident occurred in late Mar 2011 when patient listings in the Pembridge Palliative Treatment Unit, designed for St John's The hospice, were faxed wrongly.

@@@@@ The administrator in the Pembridge Palliative Treatment Unit was asked to deliver its inpatient listings to an additional send number to make sure that service supply was unaffected throughout the absence of a good out-of-hours physician.

@@@@@ Another number was put into the coversheet and also the standard practice associated with calling the hospice to verify receipt was adopted, but the receiver was only confirming invoice of the inpatient listing sent to the send number included in the fax process and not that delivered to the second send number. Consequent ly, the actual administrator continued to deliver the inpatient listings to the second send amount.

@@@@@ In regards to week afterwards, a member from the public informed the actual administrator that he have been getting the inpatient lists together shredded all of them; during this time period the supervisor had sent approximately forty five fax transmissions designed for the the hospice.

@@@@@ The actual inpatient lists contained private and sensitive personal information relating to 59 people in total, a lot of whom were getting palliative care; this particular included medical diagnostic category, information regarding patients' domestic scenario and resuscitation guidelines.

@@@@@ The actual ICO's investigation found the fact that trust also did not provide sufficient information protection guidance and teaching to the employee worried.

@@@@@ Sophie Eckersley, the actual ICO's head of observance, stated: “Patients depen d on the NHS to maintain their details secure. In this instance the actual NHS trust did not keep the patients' sensitive information safe. The truth that these details was delivered to the wrong receiver for three months without other people noticing causes this case even more stressing. ”